Servicemember Personal Injury Damages Expertise

Military compensation, entitlements, and benefits can complicate a seemingly straightforward Servicemember-Plaintiff’s personal injury damages case. Given the nature of the relationship between the United States and a Servicemember, it is entirely possible the U.S. Government will mitigate a defendant’s damages liability for a plaintiff’s compensatory, medical, and future employment damages.

Our attorneys at MNB Meridian Law, Ltd. are the leading experts on the interplay of a Servicemember’s military service and the compensation, entitlements, and benefits they will receive in a personal injury action, and the defendant’s liability for personal injury damages. We identify, translate, and quantify for our clients how a Service member’s military service was (not) or will (not) be impacted by the federal government’s contribution of compensation, benefits, and entitlements over the course of the Servicemember’s career or life. We then show in turn how that will affect the monetary value of a servicemember-plaintiff’s personal injury claim, and how much a defendant might be obligated to pay or be spared.

For instance, as a defense expert, we reviewed an active-duty Soldier-Plaintiff’s claim for $6M in lifelong medical and employment damages allegedly due to a civilian hospital’s medical malpractice. Given the nature of the Soldier-Plaintiff’s military service, the injuries purportedly caused by the alleged medical practice were considered to be “in the line of duty” and therefore compensable by the U.S. Government. As a result, the Army medically retired the Soldier, and provided him and his family lifelong medical insurance. The Department of Veterans Affairs awarded the (now) Veteran 100% disability at nearly $4,000 per month, secondary lifelong health insurance, and educational retraining. The present value of those government benefits was approximately $235,000.

The case settled for costs, because our experts identified, translated, and quantified how the compensatory, medical, and future employment damages claim was mitigated by the U.S. Government’s contribution of compensation, entitlements, and benefits. The reality is that the U.S. Government effectively paid for the Soldier’s injuries regardless of how they happened or who caused them. This nuanced understanding is the advantage of retaining our military compensation experts.

Contact Us for Assistance

For expert assistance with issues relating to military compensation and personal injury damages, please contact us by calling 215-268-3003 or using the online contact form. With offices in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Alexandria, Virginia, MNB Meridian Law serves clients throughout the United States and around the globe.

Download a sample executive summary.

What We've Done

Navy Sailor General Discharge Upgraded to HONORABLE

A former Navy corpsman was discharged in 2014 after an “attention getting” incident related to the significant mental health issues the Sailor was facing. Despite three years of 4.0 evaluations, and no counseling, reprimands or non-judicial punishment, the Navy discharged the Sailor with a general discharge with an honorable characterization pu…

Former US Marine Sergeant

A Reserve Marine Sergeant voluntarily mobilized for a one-year rotation to Afghanistan and was partially implicated in a “red striping” hazing incident, the investigation of which was badly completed. The Marine initially received non-judicial punishment and was reduced in rank to Corporal for leadership failures because of the hazing, but not…

Army (Reserve) First Lieutenant Misconduct Filed in the Restricted File

In 2014, an Army First Lieutenant (1LT), married to another Army 1LT (assigned to an OCONUS duty station), engaged in an inappropriate (non-sexual but socially intimate) relationship with the wife of a fellow Army Officer. The 1LT-wife reported her husband and the 1LT-husband was issued a Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) and was honorably discharged…

Army Warrant Officer Receives Unanimous Decision from the ABCMR

Army Warrant Officer was accused of a sexual assault in a restaurant restroom. Army Criminal Investigation Division conducted a clumsy and partial investigation that substantiated the allegations against the Warrant Officer. As a result, the Warrant Officer was issued a Memorandum of Reprimand and had his security clearance suspended, which resulte…

Army Reserve Colonel Avoids Reprimand and Grade Determination Review Board

An Army AGR Colonel was investigated for allegations of unfair treatment of subordinates and that his actions contributed to a toxic work environment during the command’s transition back from full-time telework. Complainants alleged the Colonel was unfair in his assessment of their requests to remain on full-time telework or their medical request…
View All Case Results