Servicemember Personal Injury Damages Expertise

Military compensation, entitlements, and benefits can complicate a seemingly straightforward Servicemember-Plaintiff’s personal injury damages case. Given the nature of the relationship between the United States and a Servicemember, it is entirely possible the U.S. Government will mitigate a defendant’s damages liability for a plaintiff’s compensatory, medical, and future employment damages.

Our attorneys at MNB Meridian Law, Ltd. are the leading experts on the interplay of a Servicemember’s military service and the compensation, entitlements, and benefits they will receive in a personal injury action, and the defendant’s liability for personal injury damages. We identify, translate, and quantify for our clients how a Service member’s military service was (not) or will (not) be impacted by the federal government’s contribution of compensation, benefits, and entitlements over the course of the Servicemember’s career or life. We then show in turn how that will affect the monetary value of a servicemember-plaintiff’s personal injury claim, and how much a defendant might be obligated to pay or be spared.

For instance, as a defense expert, we reviewed an active-duty Soldier-Plaintiff’s claim for $6M in lifelong medical and employment damages allegedly due to a civilian hospital’s medical malpractice. Given the nature of the Soldier-Plaintiff’s military service, the injuries purportedly caused by the alleged medical practice were considered to be “in the line of duty” and therefore compensable by the U.S. Government. As a result, the Army medically retired the Soldier, and provided him and his family lifelong medical insurance. The Department of Veterans Affairs awarded the (now) Veteran 100% disability at nearly $4,000 per month, secondary lifelong health insurance, and educational retraining. The present value of those government benefits was approximately $235,000.

The case settled for costs, because our experts identified, translated, and quantified how the compensatory, medical, and future employment damages claim was mitigated by the U.S. Government’s contribution of compensation, entitlements, and benefits. The reality is that the U.S. Government effectively paid for the Soldier’s injuries regardless of how they happened or who caused them. This nuanced understanding is the advantage of retaining our military compensation experts.

Contact Us for Assistance

For expert assistance with issues relating to military compensation and personal injury damages, please contact us by calling 215-268-3003 or using the online contact form. With offices in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and Alexandria, Virginia, MNB Meridian Law serves clients throughout the United States and around the globe.

Download a sample executive summary.

What We've Done

Army Warrant Officer Receives Unanimous Decision from the ABCMR

Army Warrant Officer was accused of a sexual assault in a restaurant restroom. Army Criminal Investigation Division conducted a clumsy and partial investigation that substantiated the allegations against the Warrant Officer. As a result, the Warrant Officer was issued a Memorandum of Reprimand and had his security clearance suspended, which resulte…

Former Army Specialist with PTSD and “Limited Use”

In March 2003, an Army Specialist suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after participating in the first and only post-9/11 combat parachute jump, into Iraq. Shortly after his return he started to self-medicate with marijuana. He self-reported his PTSD and after pre-treatment urinalysis, the command improperly used the limited-use inf…

Army Soldier Referred to IDES after 15-years

A former Army Soldier was discharged in 2006 for a “personality disorder” after suffering panic attacks while in theater and after being forcibly sodomized three times. MNB Meridian Law attorneys successfully that the Soldier files be referred to the Army Integrated Disability Evaluation System to determine whether he should have received a dis…

Navy Sailor General Discharge Upgraded to HONORABLE

A former Navy corpsman was discharged in 2014 after an “attention getting” incident related to the significant mental health issues the Sailor was facing. Despite three years of 4.0 evaluations, and no counseling, reprimands or non-judicial punishment, the Navy discharged the Sailor with a general discharge with an honorable characterization pu…

Former US Marine Sergeant

A Reserve Marine Sergeant voluntarily mobilized for a one-year rotation to Afghanistan and was partially implicated in a “red striping” hazing incident, the investigation of which was badly completed. The Marine initially received non-judicial punishment and was reduced in rank to Corporal for leadership failures because of the hazing, but not…
View All Case Results